How to catch a Shelanite Vampire!

How to catch a Shelanite Vampire!

Although the original news site for the Meat/blood article in question originated from www.healthy-holistic-living.com, it should be no surprise who picked it up and ran worldwide with it.

As my son is studying to become a veterinarian in parallel to his general studies, much of the details concerning animal health and disease are becoming more prevalent around here these days. As most already know I have written extensively concerning the more ancient ideas surrounding man’s dietary habits, the truth of the more ancient texts which have served to drive falsities about such human conditions, as well as the truths concerning the animals themselves, and how our original Eternal Creator expressed it all to be in the beginning, etc. On the other hand we continue to have such industries as the meat & dairy industries, as well as the never ending superstitious, evil ritualistic tendencies of the false ones and those cults that follow their lead to this day. The meat industry is however under increasing scrutiny and fire from “the peoples” growing “awareness” of both their own health, and the health and welfare of the innocent animals we were given to have ONLY “husbandry” over, and NOT dominion! Ongoing is this ridiculous argument from those blood-lusters concerning meat, and the blood that resides within it, or not in it, or the make-up of said blood particles, and or percentages of blood in it, etc. All semantic arguments of circular logic from those reptilian brained priests of destruction! In fact, I am beginning to believe what so many seemingly highly intelligent people have been reporting for generations now; that the core antagonists of this cult are literally either of alien origin – (reptilian) – as many ancient texts and stone carvings so obviously depict, or some amalgamation of reptile and human form, and or both. I think I have decided to go with, “both”.

The Mammal meat vs. non-mammal meat argument:

The vast majority of mammals and birds are warm-blooded – (Having body functions that can regulate the temperature of the BLOOD which RUNS THROUGH THE FLESH) - Unlike almost all reptiles, fish, insects, amphibians and arachnids which are cold-blooded – (NOT having body functions that can regulate their bloods temperature which does NOT run through their flesh) - there are however a few exceptions with animals that have characteristics of both types. For example, bats and mole rats are mammals, but their body temperatures can vary according to their environments, especially when they are not active. Certain insects, such as hawk moths and some bees, can raise their body temperatures by beating their wings. Some fish have internal mechanisms that help keep their brains and eyes from becoming too cold, which might impair their function – i.e. predators like Sharks. Scientists tend to refine the definition of the terms "cold-blooded" and "warm-blooded" so they are less misleading; cold-blooded animals' blood is not necessarily cold, it just varies based on the temperature of their surrounding environment. The scientific terms are "ectothermic" instead of "cold-blooded" and "endothermic" or "homeothermic" instead of "warm-blooded." 

  For me this is not an argument “for” killing and consuming fish or reptiles based on a difference in biology, although some of my earlier students have gone that route. If one remembers I did point out the linguistic distinction in my book – The Land of MEAT & Honey – concerning the land crawling reptiles, but only because the text specifically differentiated them among the rest, thus I used them to make a harsh point. However, I also taught that the first instructions which preceded what “appeared” to be changed concerning the reptiles later in any text, causes us to understand that in fact, like all other animals warm or cold, it was ONLY the PRODUCTS FROM the animals that any text truly depicts to be that which was given to us for food. This is the absolute in all sciences, i.e. archaeology concerning the oldest bone being the MOST original truth, as well as the law for scholastic evidence for any text or ritual, etc., that the absolute verifiable instruction or law that is given and depicted earlier on, MUST be given absolute authority over any “other” text or ritual which may be found after it, and or at a later date. In fact, this is even understood to be the rule regarding all alleged “religious” texts by all Orthodox Rabbi’s. Unless they like something else better, then this rule is shelved.

“Satanism” (not used in the Christian understanding of the title) perverts everything positive in the same way that the Nazis took a positive symbol, the swastika, and turned it around to symbolize the negative. This is why the Satanists invert the pentagram and why they use black to symbolize the darkness, hence their Black Mass. But they also reverse the symbolism of white and that is a powerfully negative color to them. The Satanic networks, under the names of their various deities, were created by the Babylonian Brotherhood to serve their needs. We have seen that the accounts of the Watchers and their offspring, the Nefilim, include references to their blood drinking activities.

The Brotherhood know that blood contains the life-force energy. Drinking menstrual blood has always been a feature of the reptilian bloodlines because they need blood to live in this dimension. It was known as the Star Fire, the female lunar essence. The female menstrual cycle is governed by the cycles of the Moon and the blood contains that energy. Its ingredients are supposed to ensure a long life. In India it was called soma, and in Greece it was ambrosia, some researchers suggest.

This was said to be the nectar of the gods and it was - the reptilian gods who are genetic blood drinkers. The ‘holy grail’ chalice or cup is also symbolic of the womb and drinking menstrual blood, as well as being a symbol of the reptilian ‘royal’ bloodline itself. Menstrual blood was provided for the Elite of the reptilian ‘royal’ line by virgin priestesses and this is the origin of the term ‘Scarlet Woman’ or, to the Greeks, ‘Sacred Woman’. The Greek word for this, Hierodulai, was eventually translated into English as harlot and into German as ‘hores’, the origin of whore.

The word ritual derives from this practice (ritu = redness) and so do the words rite and red. Menstrual blood is one reason why the color red is so important to Satanists and it is another reason for the constant use of the color gold by the ‘royal’ bloodlines. Gold is called the metal of the gods, but to the Anunnaki of the Sumerian Tablets, menstrual blood was the ‘gold of the gods’.

The reptilians and their crossbreeds drink blood because they are drinking the person’s life-force and because they need it to exist in this dimension. They will often shape-shift into reptilians when drinking human blood and eating human flesh, I am told by those who have seen this happen.

 (Excerpt from David Icke’s – The Biggest Secret – Read full article here)

I will now comment within the article in question below in (light orange). I will however attempt to restrict my comments to only the more important points, leaving it up to the wisdom of the reader to see the vast majority of lesser and thoroughly ridiculous false points of alleged fact they are attempting to sell:

Did You Know the Red Juice in Raw Red Meat Isn't Blood

Posted on 1/23/2015 by Jews News

The red juice that often collects in a package of red meat is not blood, as many assume. Most of the blood is removed during processing and any that remains is usually contained within the muscle tissue.  – “is not blood”? And, “most of the blood is removed”….. As I most clearly proved in my book – The Land of MEAT & Honey – The Eternal Creator very clearly and specifically lays down the LAW of NO BLOOD! Not SOME blood! And NO killing! Therefore and quite obvious to us non-reptilian types, you first have to KILL in order to get to the BLOOD that you aren’t eating MUCH of.

The red liquid, instead, is a mixture of water and a protein called myoglobin, whose purpose is to help ship oxygen to muscle cells. Myoglobin is deeply pigmented, which is why the more myoglobin a meat contains, the darker (or redder) the meat will be. – Yes, this is a true function of Myoglobin. However, it is more circular logic to side track, and has absolutely nothing to the blood cells stored in all mammal flesh. It also has nothing to do with the absolute fact that there exists no process that will extract or eliminate all of the blood from any flesh.

Red meat is comprised of muscles that are used for extensive activity. Remember, myoglobin’s role is to help bring oxygen to the muscles, and oxygen is required to give muscles energy. – Again, semantics and sleight of hand! What has this to do with the blood trapped in all flesh?

So the more the muscles are used, the more myoglobin they’ll contain (and the redder in color they’ll be) – And the more the muscles are used the more blood they have pumped to them and thus, trapped within them. This is why when you prepare “white” meat such as poultry or fish, you won’t find any “blood” in the package – the white meat contains hardly any myoglobin. – Comparing cows to chickens? The average beef cow has 12 to 15 gallons of blood! The average meat chicken has 2 to 3 pints of blood! Just the sheer volume difference alone should be understood as the more truthful reason why one animals flesh is darker than the other. In my mind to make the comparison at all is pure folly. As well, you won’t find any color in the fish flesh because no blood collects within it. Not at all for the reasons they give.

MYOGLOBIN IS WHAT MAKES MEAT ‘WHITE,’ ‘DARK,’ OR ‘RED’

Is the above all CAPS statement one of absolute fact, having no possible other attributing reason for the color of flesh? Or is it just more neuro-linguistic engineering?

The level of myoglobin in meat is what ultimately dictates whether it will be “red,” “dark,” or “white.” The muscles in red meat are used for standing, walking, and other frequent activity – unlike reptiles, fish, chickens, turkeys, Ostrich, etc.., and they’re made up of slow-twitch muscle fibers – unlike all those fast moving “fast twitch” reptiles, birds, etc… Red meats’ high levels of myoglobin make it red or dark in color.

White meat, on the other hand, is made up of fast-twitch muscle fibers and is comprised of muscles used for quick bursts of activity only. They get energy from glycogen and contain little myoglobin. – Or they contain less because they are all so much smaller than all the other large animals they are using as examples. The fact is, just like all gun control propaganda, the information promoting their view is very carefully worded. The fact is, very large animals like cows have the exact amount of myoglobin that their bodies require for all movement based on their body size, and chickens, fish and other small animals, regardless of type, have the exact correct amount for their body size and weight. Thus, by this very common and logical biological understanding their entire argument is skewed and found to be false. Why? Because regardless of animal body size, each animal’s flesh and muscles will all have the exact amount of myoglobin and blood and whatever else their bodies require in order to function within the parameters in which each animal was created to move within. Thus, their overall argument is flawed!

Some animals, like chickens, contain both white and dark meat, with the dark meat found primarily in their leg muscles. If you've ever wondered why wild poultry contain mostly dark meat, it’s because they fly frequently, and the increased muscle usage means the meat contains more myoglobin. – It also means far more, at least 50% or more blood, has been continually pumped throughout their upper body flesh over longer periods of time than caged hens. None of this so far extinguishes the fact that all flesh contains blood after the animal or human is killed! Is the argument about the “color” of meat?

Do Sharks stop moving? Are Sharks slackers? Are Sharks mostly muscular? Then by their argument should not Sharks have some of the darkest meat of all? Well, I have never personally eaten any such fish, or any shell fish for that matter, but I have sat next to people who have ordered Shark steak, and it has ALWAYS been white!  Much like these pictures:

Pigs are often referred to as the “other white meat,” and that’s because, while they contain myoglobin in their muscles, the levels are not as concentrated as they are in cattle (likely because pigs are not as active) – REALLY - Did they just say that? Pigs are not active? Again, I have never eaten pork, but it is mostly white in color, just as it is for wild boar meat! Are wild boar also not active? Of course, I am not a pig expert, but I’ve watched enough nature TV to know beyond a doubt that wild boar are many things, but lazy and sluggish is not one of them. Lets look at some wild boar meat next:

 Fish, too, are typically considered white meat because most of them are able to float in the water without requiring much muscle use. – “because most of them are able to float in the water”….? I thought about rebutting this comment of illusive fact, but decided to just take a deep breath and move on.

Certain types of migratory fish, however, which swim briskly for extended periods, have dark meat, and that is again because of the increased myoglobin (examples would be tuna and shark). – Again, allow pictures and common sense for those with eye’s wide open to be our proof of another reason for some darker flesh and some identically created animals with lighter flesh color, although we have already proven Shark to not be as they are depicting as an absolute herein:

Let us begin with THIS picture!

MYOGLOBIN ALSO TELLS YOU WHEN YOUR MEAT IS OVERCOOKED

The color changes that occur as meat is cooked are also due to myoglobin. In white meat, which will be translucent when it’s raw, proteins coagulate as it is cooked, resulting in the whitish opaque appearance. – Really! But what about when its totally fresh and raw and it is still perfectly white and NOT translucent? Like this:

In red meat, myoglobin changes from red to tan and grayish brown as it is heated. As reported by the New York Times, this color change also has to do with moisture, which is why well-done meat that’s turned gray-brown is often dry. – Well, I stand corrected, those at the New York Times who lead the world in biological science say so.

“Oxygenated myoglobin is red, but when its structure is changed by heat or by other molecules, it changes color. That’s why redness in cooked meat signifies juiciness: As meat cooks, the heat causes the other meat proteins – (i.e. BLOOD!) to coagulate and squeeze out their moisture. “Oxygenated myoglobin is red”….. Oxygenated? Again, I am not an authority on blood science, but I do know enough about the biological sciences to know that blood, or any portion or attribute thereof that is “oxygenated” is, RED! The depth of the red color of all blood or blood components is of course directly related to the amount of oxygen in that portion of blood – i.e. arterial blood being more oxygenated is darker red than many other areas of the body’s blood which are far less oxygenated. So again, since blood is ALWAYS present in ALL flesh after it is cut out of a body, my overall argument retains its authority over their lust for dead flesh and blood which is the only reason this article was compiled.  

Myoglobin stays unchanged and red as the meat juices flow, then turns from red to gray-brown as the release of moisture ends and the meat becomes dry.” – Do I really have to point out the obvious issues with consuming any animals or humans blood? Here they openly explain how that blood and its components are trapped and solidified within all flesh when it dries out from the process of death and or herein specifically, cooking.

CARBON MONOXIDE IS USED SO YOUR MEAT APPEARS FRESHER THAN IT ACTUALLY IS:

When myoglobin is exposed to air, it eventually turns brown. This is why color can be a good indicator of the freshness of your meat, with red meat being fresher than meat that’s turned brown.

In the US, however, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows the use of carbon monoxide as a “preservative.” It works by attaching to myoglobin’s iron atom, turning it bright red and preventing it from interacting with oxygen.

This practice is banned in Europe and Japan, because even though it might prevent color changes, it certainly doesn't prevent bacterial growth. Carbon-monoxide-treated meat may appear fresh for weeks even though it’s already gone bad (it’s also used to preserve color in fish).

ARE THERE HEALTH DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WHITE AND DARK MEAT?

Dark meat has more fat than white meat, which is also why it’s often juicier. In poultry, the dark meat also tends to have more nutrients than white meat, including B vitamins, iron, zinc, and selenium. + Growth hormones, antibiotics, other animal parts from feed, and GMO from feeds, etc.

As far as red meat is concerned, it’s gotten a bad reputation because of its saturated fat content, but this is a myth. It’s widely stated that eating red meat causes heart disease, an association that is often blamed (incorrectly) on its impact on cholesterol levels. Yet, research has repeatedly shown that the dietary cholesterol-heart disease connection is incorrect. – Yes, MEAT industry research, not ACTUAL medical science research which overwhelmingly proves the opposite many times over. Dr. John McDougall is one such world renowned medical scientist who has been at the forefront of this research.

For example, a 2010 (Meat industry paid for) study from Harvard found no evidence that eating red meats leads to heart disease. What you need to be concerned about when eating red meat isn't its impact on your cholesterol levels… it’s whether the animal was fed grains or raised on traditional pasture.

Let us all just remember, the argument AGAINST The Eternal Creator and His system of Free-Will for all living-souls, of which the animals are proven without any viable argument to possess identically with all humans, is an argument based on both the falsified ancient textual teaching which “allows” the murder of any living being we wish, and the consumption of their flesh, with “SOME” blood in it, just as this article is so cleverly attempting to sidetrack. The much later editions of ritual murder and the eating of flesh within our elder Hebrew texts, as I prove in my first book “The Land of Meat & Honey”, which depict the false, man-made “Kashrut” or “Kosher” system of clean & unclean animals allowable for slaughter ritualistically or for food, were installed by the scribal-priest caste to give authority for all such systems, and the later expansion and redefinition's of said systems as time progresses. Articles such as these which are always prevalent, and always find their way around Jewish and Christian circles, are presented for the same reasons that the original text editors made their “corrections” as they call them; to bolster the “death narratives!” To uphold and keep supported the cultic ritualistic behaviors of drinking the essence of life! Ultimately keeping the majority of all souls outside of His “Everlasting Agreement”.

If you feel the need to read the rest of this occult propaganda, go here:

OR

READ THIS BOOK!

Everlasting Agreement

Core Elements of the Everlasting Agreement

Greetings all,

It has recently more and more come to my attention that many people who finally come to the original Torah understanding of the Everlasting Agreement, even after reading its foundational work, are still not grasping its full meaning or application.

The first thing I will advise is, check the ego! The ego somehow crept or was installed into this creation, and although it loves to lie and insist it is in control, it is not, your soul is in control. So, if your soul is in fact in control, why do we have to learn, and actively work to subdue the ego?  Well, I guess like any virus that requires some type of anti-viral application to subdue it, the application we have to use to fend off the ego is consciousness, and this works on the quantum level which I will not get into here or this will turn out to be yet another lengthy treaty. Maybe for this discussion “awareness” is a better word.

A wise teacher once said something like, “you cannot say you love your Father in heaven, and hate you’re your brother”.  Believe me I am not casting any first or last stones here, I have been guilty of this myself on many occasions, not separating the actions of the man, from the man.  It has now, for at least the fourth time been inadvertently brought to my attention that some people, after coming into His Everlasting Agreement, become and remain aggressively negative towards those they judge as living and working “outside” of His agreement.

  First off let me warn that, The Eternal’s Everlasting Agreement is NOT a single ingredient recipe, and it is surely NOT about negative activism!  I have heard the Christian saying many times, “don’t hate the sinner, hate the sin”.  Although that is actually a decent premise, the main issue with it being applied correctly, and more importantly consistently, is the ego.  In my mind there is a very thin line between hating the action, and hating the actor, and the ego is supremely adept at blurring that already impossibly thin line in most people, mainly because they are not consistently vigilant at subduing their ego yet.  Although it sounds sappy, if His soul is the Macro-soul, and our souls the Micro-soul given to us from His; and if He is pure love, then by default our souls MUST also be pure love, or they were when they were new. So, in a life-time what acts against the soul to damage it, what works tirelessly to quell that love, obviously the ego. The ego in us works against us from the inside, and the ego in others works on us again from without if you let them. The Buddhists have that understanding of the ego locked down, however, they also lock themselves away from all other ego’s to practice on their theories while subtracting the real world experience. While we in the West have all the real world experience any mortal should endure, without any of their excellent understanding for subduing it.  Aren't we lucky that The Eternal One loves simplicity, even among His great complexities. His simplicity for the world is rooted in His main law –“Do not kill” – The Everlasting Agreement.  

Is a person truly “returned” to Him if they change their diet, even if they also change the way they think about the animals, along with the rest of all non-sentient life in His creation, but also harbors ill feelings for those still outside?  I think we can all agree that there are many Vegans who are horrible people, so the dietary aspect of this cannot be the sole ingredient.  Many change their diet for medical or health reasons, and still find no issue will murdering our fellow man in wars, or for so called justice. For some who are led to His Everlasting Agreement, the ego will of course allow those people to believe they in fact are returned, a dangerous ego driven lie for sure. The ego in that person stands in the way of their complete cleansing, they are not yet returned.

I comment on this issue to you all because this is a dangerous condition to find yourself in, like stuck between two worlds and not knowing it, or because of the ego, absolutely convinced you are not.

I finally decided to comment on this topic after someone made certain comments to me last week in answer to comments I recently made concerning my views on teaching new people, and how all the many side issues newcomers stress on like, the identity of a messiah; Sabbath timing; ritual specifics, etc., should be completely forgotten, at least until those people became fully versed and committed to His agreement.

In most cases if a person tells you that His Everlasting Agreement is not, or cannot be all that is required, we know this person is either one of two things, a dogmatic religious fanatic, or someone who found the Everlasting Agreement, but still does not fully understand it. Surely I did not teach you that the Everlasting Agreement is about activism or evangelism. Nor did its foundational book even begin teaching you about the agreement before teaching you that you had to change yourself, by searching yourself, and what and why you believe the things you believed to that point, before moving on.  I did however teach in that book, that His Everlasting Agreement terms of service required two things, and in these two things you would automatically fulfill the 1^st and greatest command.

The first thing one must do to “Teshuvah”, is to commit oneself to His foundational and perpetual rule which is, do not murder anything in which He gave His Living-Soul, and, do not consume flesh! In this there will be a period of physical and spiritual cleansing that will vary from person to person. The second part is not unlike the first.  In fact, it is the first part that is most responsible for the greater and greater success of the second part, which is – “Treat all living souls as you would have them treat you”.  In fact, one might even say that ALL of the original Instructions hang on this one right here. Or did someone already mention that?  The fact is, doing one of these in complete truth, forces one to also do the other, and visa-versa into perpetuity. It all again falls under the adage that you cannot say you love your Eternal Father in heaven, which is the first and greatest command, while you also hate your brother, and as we should know, all are one from the first man and woman.

So, that’s it in a nutshell if you or others you may be aware of somehow missed it within the many reiterations I made in the LMH book.  It’s not about hating their actions, or beating people into submission, or lighting fires under the guise of righteous anger, that’s all ego driven.  Some souls are ready to come back to this in your lifetime, and most are not, that’s the system. Anything we do outside the very limited boundaries of His system, is again, all ego driven and a waste of energy.

When pushed for answers or stressing yourself on any of the many non-issue side topics, just reinforce the two parts of His Everlasting Agreement, and know that they work in perfect circular symmetry.  It also allows Him to work in that person or you, at their pace. Which in time will allow them, or you, to release all those nonessential former beliefs one by one. It is much better to let Him dissolve the lies and misconceptions slowly, one by one, rather than us ripping them out before their internal structure is strong enough to safely allow their loss.  Especially since their temporary, or even long term grip on those former dogmas or superstitions will not be the cause of their soul’s demise.

And to quote another wise man – “all else if vanity”.

Subtraction is often more!

Dr. S. Asher  ©2014

New Radio Interviews

Radio Interviews w/ Dr. Asher

For more in-depth topic discussions by Dr. Asher, go here to become an AHLCglobal member!

OffPlanet Radio Interview Series by Randy Maugans

The Tri-Unity Show Series is based on the various concepts and proofs within my Soul Revolution book, as well as topics from previous works. The goal is to possibly expand a bit further on the lofty topic of Soul Revolution and to drive its overall concept and enlightenment to a greater population.

SHOW-1: 

SHOW-2:

 SHOW-3:

SHOW-4: 

SHOW-5:

 

SHOW-6:

SHOW-7:

OffPlanetRadio.com Tri-Unity Series Page Here!

The Byte Show Interview Series:

Tracing the lineage of Shelanite-Judah from Egypt to Khazaria and into our Modern times - Part-1:

Tracing the lineage of Shelanite-Judah from Egypt to Khazaria and into our Modern times - Part-2

Genesis - Understanding the Creation of the Free Will system:

Check out other relevant topics and personalities on OffPlanetRadio.com

Asteroids, Aliens,Righteous & Elect?

Asteroids, Aliens, Righteous & Elect?

As it was in the days of Noach....and later Moshe,

How will the Root & Branches be save from fire?

Isaiah 22: “you killed sheep and cattle to eat! And you drank wine; This evil will never be forgiven them as long as they live!” 

Interesting question, of course so many ideas about on many end-days questions, I believe as always that only that which occurred previously can be used as our partial template in the future to glimpse how the prophesies may play out.

Last time by water, this time fire, (radiation) most likely, and all the Kings and mighty men of the earth have made their plans, dug their holes, and forgotten all of us in their process; but maybe that's a good thing. Keep in mind the words of the prophet who depicts their grand plans of subterranean living not working out so well for them, praying that all that rock will just fall on them.

Well, that's them, but what about all the rest of the not so evil people?  Of course most have to get by their dogmatic superstitious training to truly understand WHO is evil and WHO is not, but that's another entire book entirely. My question, as yours should be, 'how will the Eternal One אהיה cover His people this time?' 

Of course, the governments of the world, their Kings and mighty men, have been working diligently to keep all populations off balance and in the dark for many years, and from their true plans. Digging their "DUMBS" - (Deep Underground, Military, Bases) - and starting wars in very specific lands which all have great ancient significance in order to cover their on-going search and recovery Ops for ancient technologies, all in preparation for this coming day of fire.

 Yes, there are a multitude of issues worldwide we can point to, gun control, martial law prep, militarization of all police, etc., and yes, the populations of earth are consumed with all such issues on a daily basis like fish intoxicated by shiny objects, and at the same time generally missing the most important news events.

A midst all of the news fodder, in late 2013 I noticed and began following all the military movement of earth moving equipment and other types of vehicles to the East coast of the USA.

 As well, finding other related information via several news sources occurring at the same time, and in conjunction as FEMA operations for what they call "Region-3"; like purchase order documents for millions of medical related apparel, medical tents, all medical related gear and supplies, individual water and food rations, etc.

 All found and documented via their own purchase orders which can be found on-line still. In fact, along with their ridiculously massive ammunition purchased of 2012-13, much of these purchases were finally questioned in Congressional hearings in 2013, so we know they occurred.

If that was not enough, I also found Mainstream News video of none other than the Governor of Puerto Rico, not questioning, but reporting on the mass off-loading of US military vehicles and equipment at their largest port in expectation of a massive Tsunami, which she said is expected to hit them, and the entire East coast of the US mainland. However, she gave no time frame, nor a reason for the Tsunami. The off-loading of this equipment in PR was occurring at the same time long trains of the same were being moved to the East coast. As well, I found no evidence during or after of this equipment or purchases being made in preparation of some civil emergency FEMA drills. This is the pre-positioning of supplies and equipment for a known future event. It was the large numbers of earth moving equipment painted in military desert tan that alerts us to the kind of event it will be.
 Still, no definitive time frame or reason for the event loss of the entire East coast of America to the ocean, until more recently. This event must be close at hand, because certain people in the know who once believed they were counted among the beautiful people to be saved from the wrath of some god, have evidently come to the realization that are not "chosen", and will be above ground with front row seats like the rest of us, Whoops!

We see in 2014 more and more people, to include one Spanish scientist - (catholic), from Puerto Rico, who says he had a major vision given to him about this exact coming event by none other than the god Yah-Hovah! It appears YHVH told this scientist that he was about to punish the USA for, now get this, attacking his MOON! No, you just cannot make this up.

 Now, generally I would not give even a microsecond of ear to such alleged prophetic gibberish, but amazingly, about a year prior to YHVH touching base with this guy, NASA, or someone, actually SHOT the moon, with not ONE, but with TWO NUKES!  This event went completely unreported as usual, and when finally found out, the practitioners of the New Babel Tower - NASA - gave some ludicrous reason for doing it. Either way, evidently they pissed off the wrong false god.

You can Google this guys prophetic message, I have also seen it reported on Youtube. In short, YHVH is sending a 5 mile wide asteroid into the Atlantic Ocean between the coastlines of the U.S mainland and PR. Now, the effects of this size asteroid will not flood much further than 150 miles inland, BUT, YHVH told this guy that "other" effects, as in some type of bio-hazard from this asteroid will wreak havoc all the way to the American West coast. Thanks for that NASA! My guess is they finally found out the true and very ancient reason for the moon being placed there, and tried to end it.

If you have not yet learned who this ancient false god entity named Yahweh or Jehovah -YHVH actually is, I give you the proof from your own lacking English concordance directly below. Far more extensive proof of his false identity, as well as the false identity of those who follow him and much, much, more can be found in my Asher Codex:

The suffix “hovah” is No. 1943 in Strong’s Hebrew Dictionary, and has the meaning of calamity, ruin, mischief, perversion, and wickedness.

It is another form of No. 1942, ‘havvah’ {EVE’s name}, which can be translated as calamity, iniquity, mischief, mischievous thing, naughtiness, naughty, noisome, perverse thing, substance, very wicked.

Put the two (Yah + Hovah) together and you get “God of ruin, mischief, calamity, perversion, and wickedness.” Simply put, Jehovah, Yah’hovah etc., is The false god entity of Evil!

HOVAH is the LONG and well established Phoenician god, the main deity of most Canaanite tribes. Even most of the Arabs knew Hovah as their main deity prior to Muhammad's experience. The “Yah” only later Hebrew-ized it.

My hypothesis, which appears to be upheld by the information you will see in the short videos below, as well in many others you may find during your own search, is a question really. If we can identify that The Eternal One sent His Malakim to our ancient ones, to cover those considered to be Righteous people from certain evil entities and the calamities they contrived by several means, then how will the modern or future Righteous people be covered from this fire in these days? Obviously NOT from living underground, since our prophets warned against that.

We can at least begin with the progeny of Adamah & Hawwah - (Enoch, Methuselah, Lemech, Noach) within the limited texts we have been allowed to see thus far, to know how they were covered. Enoch was taken away more than once and most likely still lives. The same perfection was also found in Noach as we know. 
 Did Noach view his escape as a Greater Exodus? I would bet he certainly did, and surely all of those animals were considered as Righteous ones or Yehshurun, just as Enoch very specifically and clearly tells us there will be again in this next, end by fire. Then by this picture, we must also understand that Noach and his family members were The Elect ones of their time! Again, just as Enoch's prophesies tell us there will be both Righteous ones, and Elect ones in this next end. Now, taking this template and re-applying it in this final and 2nd Greater Exodus event; and by whatever means we are covered, concealed, or removed, although few in number, there will also be human Righteous ones, alongside of the much larger numbers of the elect people. For far greater understanding on this subject of the two peoples, read my Greater Exodus - AFTER reading the first book - The Land of Meat & Honey.

Although certain unconfirmed reports and folklore have been put forth regarding the alleged proof for Noach's literal wooden ark, do we really KNOW that Noach's covering event was terrestrial in nature? I mean we also believe that the prophet Ezekiel and others were transported around by what we would consider non-terrestrial vehicles. So why them, and not Noach? And by extension, why not us? 
 If the Eternal One, as I have proven via the eldest available Hebrew texts in my book "The Land of Meat & Honey", has a literal occupation of "Creating", which means He created before us and after. Then we also have to agree that He created other worlds and other beings. Therefore, these must be those who visited everyone from Enoch or Ezekiel and after. So then, why wouldn't these advanced guard entities be used to aid Noach, and Moshe, and hopefully us in these same ways.

 I mean we all tend to agree on what I consider to be the most foundation understanding of any text, idea, ritual or consideration, and that is - I AM THE ETERNAL YOUR CREATOR, AND I DO NOT MODIFY!" 

Also by extension then, in order for those or any living-soul entity who was created by HIM to reflect His Image, they also can-NOT modify. Thus, I believe we can utilize the basic points of the ancient stories/events as a future template of our own.

Enoch was told to hide from certain evil beings; Noach was told to remain within the Ark for a time; Moshe and the sons were told to remain in their dwelling for a night; Moshe was later instructed to have ALL the sons of Jacob, and all those affiliated with them to remain within their dwellings every Sabbath day for all their generations; later the prophets, even Yehshua, and also the Revelation book say to remain in our dwelling for a time during end day events-

"Until certain indignation's (PASS-OVER!)..."

Are these all coincidental, or are we seeing a pattern, a template to look for and plan for?

After many years of not openly teaching people the reality of a coming 2nd and Greater Exodus as explicitly outlined by our Hebrew prophets, but hidden as such from the gentiles, I was finally driven by The Eternal in 2005 to begin expanding on the subject, and eventually make it available to everyone.

 However, in that book I did not attempt to expand past the obvious terrestrial boundaries in which the prophets spoke. Nor do I generally speak in such non-terrestrial terms on this subject to most people because it all tends to devolve into mere science fiction rather quickly, and not seriously considered.

 As much as I pray and wait for this prophesied 2nd Greater Exodus as I depicted it as solely a terrestrial event, that does not mean the prophets, or my own depiction of what the prophets gave us will not be accomplished by some other lesser terrestrial solution.

I thought I would touch on this topic now because many such news stories from more and more "accepted, credible" sources, i.e. leaders, scientists, and news sources, have been emerging more frequently. Such secular information, without the continual reminder that The True Eternal One has His plans and His ways to save His Righteous & Elect, just as He has always done, are not only under way, but imminent.

Those who are known by HIS NAME....will be saved! So I guess you better KNOW the correct name, aye?

If you have not read the book this book –

 Buy it Here!

and corrected your course via His Everlasting Agreement, we all pray and suggest you do so quickly.

I added the following related subject video's in the order they should be watched. You should spend some time searching this topic further:

IS THIS IMAGE REAL? IT WOULD APPEAR TO BE. IS THIS A WAITING ARK?

Connection Between Ancient Indian & the Hebrew Languages?

Is There a Connection Between

Ancient Indian & the Hebrew Languages?

A scholar finds compelling evidence for ancient Indian influence on a global scale.

Originally posted on ViewZone, The AHLCglobal welcomes this highly researched work by scholar, Gene D. Matlock, which is part of his complete manuscript showing the global influence of ancient India's culture and language. We welcome your comments and thoughts.

Had you been a cartographer and geographer working for the British East India company in the 17th and 18th centuries, you would have found all over India thousands of Hebrew-like place names with similar meanings in both languages as well. The map excerpt below shows a small section of ancient Seuna-Desa (Zion Land) in what is now Maharashtra (to right).  

At the bottom right of the excerpt is the city of Paithan, on the banks of the river Godivari. The Indo-Hebrews named the part of the river passing through Paithan's territory Paithan (Pison, Phison), according to their traditions. In the upper left-hand corner is the city of Satana. According to the legends of the Yadavas (Indo-Hebrews), Satana would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorah envious. The Seunas and the Satanas decided to resolve their moral and religious differences on the battlefield. The forces of "Satan" lost, but their defeat didn't dishearten them. Eventually, we came to think of "Satan" as a being who lost the battle but not the war. The bible tells us that such a peace treaty hasn't yet been signed between these two ancient enemies.

In that part of India, the holiest of holies for the Indians, the names of many towns end in the appendage gaon. In Hebrew, gaon means "genius; great rabbinical scholar." Also in this region is an area that was once the favorite of Yadava royalty: Nashik, the exact Hebrew name for "Royal Prince." Satan is near the district called Khandesh (Land of Cain). There is also a Kodesh. Kod and Khad are Sanskrit terms for "First," "The Beginning," or "God." In Hebrew, Khadesh = "The first day of a Jewish calendar month." Notice that all these names have similar meanings and religious connotations in both languages. I invite my readers to investigate this anomaly for themselves.

The similarity of these Indian and Hebrew names certainly traumatized European colonists. Unwilling to admit that the Hebrews had never sprouted spontaneously in the Arabian desert, or were from outer space as I read recently, but were from the East as the bible itself tells us, they merely erased these matters from their minds or convinced themselves that they were "coincidences," even though the "coincidences" numbered in the thousands and were peppered over every region in India.

A 19th Century British Scholar Explains Why the Western World Never Learned About the Indian Origins of the Hebrews.

Though not generally known in this day and age, Godfrey Higgins (1772-1833), archeologist, politician, humanitarian, social reformer, and author, was one of the most enlightened and educated men of early 19th century England. He was a well-known iconoclast, rationalist, and admirer of the Hebrews, who vehemently opposed any kind of persecution of this

ancient religious group. He wrote two oversized volumes, totaling around 1600 pages of fine print, about the Hebrews' Indian origins. These two volumes, entitled Anacalypsis, are extremely rare. The last printing was done in 1965 by University Books, NY. It's a difficult book to read because the author painstakingly proved the minutest of details in his dissertation. Even good readers need several weeks to finish it.

The first printing consisted of only 200 copies, twenty of which he had to give away. Only a few of the remaining 180 copies were sold. For nearly thirty years, the religious communities of England and Europe quietly suppressed the book. It has since been reprinted three times, but including the first printing, the total copies printed never totaled over a thousand. Only occasionally can it be found in a library. Even so, many authors have quoted and plagiarized it. Not a few spiritual charlatans, such as fraudulent mystics, psychics, and the Presbyterian preacher who wrote the novel on which The Book of Mormon is based, used Anacalypsis to produce their respective heresies and agendas. The famous 19th century mystic and founder of Theosophy, Madam Blavatsky, took advantage of the world's nearly total ignorance of this magnificent document, using much of Higgin's information, to convince the gullible that she had acquired her "mystical knowledge" from "otherworldly" sources called "Akashic records."

Godfrey Higgins gave an opinion that I have always espoused, which explains in part why the similarities of peoples, languages, philosophies, and place names between India and the Middle East became lost to the memory of mankind after Christianity and Islam took over the West.

"The outlines of the history of the extended empires, which I have here exhibited, would have been more conspicuous had our makers of maps and histories recorded the names of the places as they must have appeared to them. But from their native religious prejudices and necessary ignorance of the nature of the history, it seemed to them absurd to believe, that there should be places or persons in the East having exactly the same names as places and persons in the West; and to avoid the feared ridicule of their contemporaries, which in fact in opposition to the plainest evidence, and which they themselves could not entirely resist, that they thought well-founded, they have, as much as possible disguised the names. Thus, that which otherwise they would have called David-pouri, they called Daud-poutr, Solomon, Soleiman; Johnguior, Jahanguior, etc., etc. In the same way, without any wrong intention, they have been induced to secrete the truth, in many cases, from themselves, by hastily adopting the idea that the old Jewish names of places have been given by the modern Saracens or Turks, the erroneousness of which a moment's unprejudiced consideration would have shewn...I shall here merely add, that...I have observed...a great similarity in the countries where the tribes of Judah were settled in the East and in the West. The Western country seems, as much as possible, to have been accommodated by the Eastern..." (Vol. I, pp. 437-438.)

 "When Mahmud of Gazna, the first Mohammedan conqueror, attacked Lahore, he found it defended by a native Hindoo prince called Daood or David. This single fact is enough to settle the question of the places not being named by Mohamedans." (Vol. I; p. 432.)

 "I beg my reader to look at the ruins of the ancient cities of India: Agra, Delhi, Oude, Mundore, etc., which have many of them been much larger than London, the last for instance, 37 miles in circumference, built in the oldest style of architecture in the world, the Cyclopean, and I think he must at once see the absurdity of the little Jewish mountain tribe (the "Lost Tribes") being the founders of such a mass of cities. We must also consider that we have almost all the places of India in Western Syria...I think no one can help seeing that these circumstances are to be accounted for in no other way than by the supposition that there was in very ancient times one universal superstition, which was carried all over the world by emigrating tribes, and that they were originally from Upper India." (Vol. I; p. 432.)

 "...the natives of Cashmere as well as those of Afghanistan, pretending to be descended from the Jews, give pedigrees of their kings reigning in their present country up to the sun and the moon, and along with this, they shew you the Temples still standing, built by Solomon, statues of Noah, and other Jewish Patriarchs...the traditions of the Afghans tell them, that they are descended from the tribe of Ioudi or Yuda, and in this they are right, for it is the tribe of Joudi noticed by Eusebius to have existed before the Son of Jacob in Western Syria was born, the Joudi of Oude, and from which tribe the Western Jews with the Brahmin (Abraham) descended and migrated. (Vol. I; p. 740.)

 "In the valley of Cashmere, on a hill close to the lake, are the ruins of a temple of Solomon. The history states that Solomon, finding the valley all covered with water except this hill, which was an island, opened the passage in the mountains and let most of it out, thus giving to Cashmere its beautiful plains. The temple which is built on the hill is called Tucht Suliman. Afterwards Forster says, 'Previously to the Mahometan conquest of India, Kashmere was celebrated for the learning of the Brahmins and the magnificent construction of its temple.' Now what am I to make of this? Were these Brahmans Jews, or the Jews Brahmins? The inadvertent way in which Forster states the fact precludes all idea of deceit...

"The Tuct Soliman of Cashmere in the time of Bernier, was described by him to be in ruins, and to have been a temple of the idolaters and not of the Mohamedans. The Mohamedans reported that it was built by Solomon, in very ancient times. All this at once does away with the pretence that it was a building of the modern Mohamedans; and is a strong confirmation of the Jewish nature of the other names of the towns - Yuda-poor, Iod-pore, etc., etc. Bernier goes on to say...that the name of Mousa or Moses is common among the natives, that Moses died at Cashmere, and that they yet show the ruins of his tomb near the town. This is curious when connected with the fact, that the Jews of Western Syria say, no one ever knew where he was buried." (Vol. I; p. 771.)

An article in the April, 1997 issue of the Jewish magazine “Moment” discusses the possibility that a heavy Jewish presence once dominated India.

"A tribe of Sunni Moslems called the Pathans, now living in parts of Pakistan, number at least 15 million. The Pathan language bears traces of biblical Hebrew, and the Pathans themselves claim lineage from King Saul. They are said to follow, in varying degrees of observance, some 21 'Jewish' customs, including lighting candles on Friday night, wearing a four-cornered prayer garment, and performing circumcision on the eighth day.

Then there are the Kashmiris from Northern India, who number about five million; although they too are predominantly Sunni Moslems, many bear biblical-sounding names like Cleb (Caleb), Israel, Hahana, and Lavni..." (Searching for the Lost Tribes, by Winston Pickett, p. 51.)

Aramaic, a language as similar to Hebrew as Spanish is to Portuguese, originated in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan were once part of India. Afghanistan seceded from Indian in the 1700s. Pakistan was cut out of India when the two nations were partitioned after World War II. Aramaic also is the source of modern Hebrew's square alphabet, used in Israel today. The Hebrew square alphabet and the truth that Hebrew is just an Aramaic dialect confirm the Indian origin of the Jews.

Those Christian and Jewish authorities who don't want it to be true that ten to thirty million Jews once lived in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Northwestern India say that it is just a "coincidence" that so many tribes and places there have biblical names. Others insist that the Moslems christened all those tribes and places. As Godfrey Higgins tells us, many of those tribes and places had already received their so-called "biblical names" millenniums before Islam was a gleam in Mohammed's eyes and many centuries before those same names started showing up in the Middle East. Some of Israel's tribal and place names also started appearing in Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Northwestern India when Sargon II and Nebuchadnezzar exiled most of the Hebrews to that part of the world. The confusion about the origin of those tribal and place names will always exist as long as we stubbornly refuse to give the Indo-Hebrews their rightful place in history. The Aryans and Indo-Hebrews began to overrun parts of India and the Middle East around 2000 BC, perhaps more than a thousand years previously if there is any truth to the story about the progeny of Noah.

Somehow, our brainwashed minds blank out the face that the Ancient Egyptian and Akkadian names or Hebrew, Habiru, and Apiru were derived from Indo-Hebrew dialects and meant "Sons of Ophir." The truth about the origins of the Hebrews has been screaming in our faces for thousands of years, but our benumbed minds have chosen not to hear it.

What Inferences Can You Draw From the Following List? Well-Known Names in the Western World Equivalent Names in Indian Languages Minoa (Ancient Greek nation). Meena (Indian ancestors of the Minoans) Turbazu (Palestinian clan) Turvazu (Indo-Hebrew tribe) Kopt; Guptas (Ancient Egyptian dynasty) Gupta (Ancient Indian ruling dynasty) Saracens (Ancient Turks) Sauresena (Territory and people of Ancient India) Arabea (Arabs) Arabi(Original inhabitants of Indo-Hebrew Makran, now part of Pakistan) Islam (Mohammedan religion) Ishalayam (Temple of God) Khurus or Khouros (Powerful Arab tribe to which Mohammed belonged) Kurus (Ancient Indo-Hebrew tribe) Mecca (Islam's most sacred city.) Makka (Capital of Arabi Makran) Riyadh (Saudi Arabian capital) Ray (Wisdom) + Yuddha (Warrior) Mohamed (Father of Islam) Maha-Atma (Great Soul) Jidda (Saudi Arabian city) Juddha, Yuddha (Warrior) Cabul (Town in Israel) Kabul (Capital of Afghanistan) Bashan (Region of Jordan) Bazana; Vashana (Ancient capital of Gujarat) Manesseh (Territory and tribe of Israel) Manasa (Himalayan lake, near Mount Meru; also the name of a snake deity) Laish (City of Canaan) Laish (Town in Afghanistan) Cutha (Fort and city in ancient Southern Mesopotamia) Kuth; Cathia; Cutch (Part of Gujarat) Hellenes (Ancient people and territory in Greece) Hellenes; Alinas (People and territory of Ancient India). Javan (Father of Greeks; mentioned in Genesis). Yavana (Ancient Indo-Hebrew tribe) Iberia (Spain) Abhira (Indo-Hebrew nation) Brit (Great Britain) Bharat (True name of India) Angles (Ancient people of England) Anguli (Ancient people of India) Jutes, Jutis (Eastern tribe that invaded and settled in Europe) Yuddhi (Ancient Indian warriors) Goths (Eastern tribe that invaded and settled in Europe) Guti; Gauda (Ancient Indian tribe that migrated to the Middle East) Yemen (Arab country) Yamuna (River of India) Yehudi (Jewish People) Yutiya; Yah-Khuda (Sanskrit name of the Indo-Hebraic Yadus) Roma (Rome, Italy) Roma; Romaka (People and territory of Northern India) Dubai (Nation of Arab Emirate) Dwab (Territory of ancient Afghanistan) Sheba (Ancient Ethiopian kingdom) Siva; Sibi (Territory of ancient Yaudheyapura, India) Syria (Middle Eastern home of the ancient Jews) Suriya (Mythical Indian territory) Succoth (Place near Jordan and in Egypt) Sukhothai (Ancient Indian and Thai kingdom) Talmud (Written Jewish teachings) Tal-Mudra (Sacred Indian teachings written on palm leaves) Tallit (Jewish prayer shawl) Tal-Ata (Palmyra leaves worn on the shoulders as a raincoat) Kippot (Skullcap worn by Orthodox Jews) Kaparda (Hair top-knot once worn by the first ancestors of the Indo-Hebrews) Shalmanezer (Assyrian king who deported the "Lost Tribes" to India) Shalmanev (Tall, impressive person) Baal (Golden calf first worshiped by the Jews) Balesar (Holy bull worshiped in India)

Linguistic Similarities between Hebrew and Kashmiri

Holger Kersten wrote in Jesus Lived in India,

 "The relation between ancient Israel and Kashmiri can most clearly be demonstrated linguistically. Kashmirian is different from all the other Indian languages, the origins of which are Sanskrit. The development of the language of Kashmir has been greatly influenced by the Hebrew. Abdul Ahad Azad writes, 'The language of Kashmir derives from Hebrew.' According to tradition, in ancient times Jewish peoples settled here, whose language changed into the Kashmirian of today. There are many Hebrew words that are quite obviously connected with the language of Kashmir." (pp. 68-69.)

 I have inferred from Kersten's comments that he believes Kashmiri did not spring from Sanskrit. I disagree. When I was culling out Hebrew words from Grierson's Dictionary of the Kashmiri Language, I discovered that there are many more Sanskrit words in Kashmiri than Hebrew terms. However, I do agree that the Hebrews made more than a notable contribution to this little-known tongue.

 "Since the Jews i.e. the Yedu tribes of Lord Krishna left the Dwarka region, the original Sanskrit that they spoke during Lord Krishna's time has undergone considerable change of pronunciation and admixture of words, so what was Sanskrit 5,742 years ago is now Hebrew." (World Vedic Heritage; by P. N. Oak; p. 530.

In the Spanish edition of the German author Siegfried Obermeir's book on Jesus' life in Kashmir, Murio Jesus en Cachemira? (Did Jesus die in Kashmir?), the author acknowledges the Sanskrit origins of the language.

"One could perhaps ask whether the language called 'Kashmiri' could in some way be a close relative of Hebrew and Aramaic...The reply is a resounding 'no.' Kashmiri descends from Sanskrit. There exists only one explanation. The Jews who emigrated (to Kashmir) introduced their language there." (p.150.)

Professor Fida Hassnain, a Kashmiri authority on the life of Jesus Christ in his country, wrote in A Search for the Historical Jesus, "Today the Kashmiri language contains 30% Persian, 25% Arabic and 45% words from Sanskrit and other languages, including 9% from Hebrew." (p. 10.)

Professor Hassnain mentioned in his book an Aramaic inscription beside the ruins of Gondaphorus' castle in Taxila, which actually confirms that St. Thomas was there: "A highly regarded foreign carpenter, who is a pious devotee of the Son of God, built this palace of cedar and ivory for the great king." The phrase "Son of God" seems to confirm that Jesus actually existed.

A stone relief of Thomas stands near this inscription. Indian archaeologists have confirmed this fact.

Since the ancient Hebrews never forced their language on the peoples in their ambiance, just their religion, I concur with authors Obermeir and Hassnain on this point.

In old times, Kashmiri didn't exist as a distinct language as it does today. The Kashmiri historical treatises state that the Brahmans and Kashatriya castes spoke Sanskrit; the Vaishyas and the Sudras spoke a language called Ap-Abram-Sha, which was supposed to be a degraded form of Tamil. Was this the original Asura language, or, perhaps, prototypical Hebrew?

Some Hindu scholars think so. Abraham was the father of several different peoples, religions, and Semitic dialects. Abraham's influence formed at least part of the foundations of Judaism, Greek and Roman religious practices, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism, and others. When the "Lost Tribes" were taken to Northern India, they found a people with a similar religion, language, and cultural traits. It took no great effort for the "Lost Tribes" to assimilate completely. Later on, Hebrew, Dardic, Apabramsha, Sanskrit, Arabic, and other languages merged to form what we now call Kashmiri. Some scholars say that the Moslem invaders forbade the speaking of Apabramsha and Hebrew in Kashmir.

The Buddhists say that the Abhiraans spoke "Abhira." The Yadavas, the actual proto-typical Hebrews still living in India, also claim to have spoken a language called Abhiri. "The Natyasastra of Bharata described the language...as Abhiri or Sabari. It is well known that Abhiri was the language of the Abhiras." (Yadavas Through the Ages, by Yadav Singh; Vol. II, p. 4.) Yadav Singh's opinion on this matter may prove to be correct. Even today, Israeli Jews whose roots sink deep into Israeli soil are called "Sabaras."

I have taken from my Kashmiri dictionary a long list of words that are similar in pronunciation and meaning to Hebrew. I could have easily provided a list containing hundreds more, many of which I shall mention in later chapters. However, I hope that the following list will convince you that the Kashmiri language, one of the most little-known languages in the world, deserves more attention and study.

Judaism and Shaivite Hinduism Share the Same Names for God.

Judaism Shaivism Ish; Yish; Is; Isa; Issa; El; Al; etc. (Suffixes and prefixes for "God") The same in Shaivism Yahve; Jahve; Tseeva (God) Shiva; Shaiva; Siva (God) Elohim; Elokhim (God intellectualized) Lakhimi (Goddess of Prosperity); Lokhi; Lukh (Shiva) El Shaddai (The Almighty) Saday; Sada (Shiva) Ha-Kadosh (The Holy One) Hakh-e-Kheda (God's Duty) El Elyon (Possessor of Heaven and Earth) Il Layun (Absorption in God) Yesoda (Dual Sexual Nature of Life) Yeshoda (Shiva's Dual Sexual Nature) Similar sacred symbolism and iconography are associated with both the Hebrew Yah-Veh and the Kashmiri Shaiva: The Holy Trinity; the flame; the cherub; the guardian angel; the snake; the bull; blowing of bull's horn, etc. Hebrew and Kashmiri Cabalistic Terminology Is About the Same. Hebrew Kashmiri Ani (he spark of life) Agni (Vedic god of fire) Avoda (work; labor) Vud; Wud (skilled labor) Ayeen (void; non-being) Ayen (eternity) Cabala (acceptance) Cabul (acceptance) Guevara (force) Gav'r (surrounding and attacking) Keter (crown) Kash'r (crown of the head) Kijum (destiny) Ko-Yimi (path to death) Klim (nothing) Kholi (nothing) Malkuth (kingdom) Mulakh (kingdom) Nefesh (soul) Naph's (soul; spirit self) Sephiroth (spiritual energy centers) Sipath (spiritual energy centers) Yesu; Yesh; Yeh; Yahu; Yakhu; Yah; Yao; Ie (The Material Universe) The same as in Judaism Yesh me Ayeen (The Goal of Creation) Yech me ayen (Creation Fused to the Void) Zohar (brilliance) Swar; Svar (Heaven; light; brilliance)

More Linguistic Proof of the Linkage between India and the Middle East

My investigations into the Indian origins of the Hebrews and Holy Land place names are not the first to have been made. In the mid-part of the 19th century, the Identification Society of London, an organization dedicated to searching for the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, published the following list to prove that the Afghans, Tibetans, Kashmiris, and other Northwest Indian tribes are either descended from the Hebrews or vice-versa. Not all the tribes, castes, and sub-castes on their list have preserved their Hebrewness. However, nearly all of them acknowledge their Hebrew roots. As you read this list of names, remember that they exist in the area that Josephus said was peopled by the descendants of Shem. "These inhabited from Cophen, an Indian river (the Kabul river) and in part of Asia adjoining it. (Josephus...; Chapter VII-4.)

Many scholars believe that the Dravidians could have been the ancestors of the prototypical Hebrews, the Meluhhans, who came from the Tibetan plateau or from the Turanian homeland of Central Asia - the area originally peopled by the progeny of Shem.

As Kauleshwar Rai wrote in Ancient India,

"...there was a time when the Dravidians inhabited the whole of India including Sind, Baluchistan and the Punjab. Gradually, they migrated to Mesopotamia also." (p. 19.)

  

In the following list, all references to Indian tribes, castes, sub-castes, and places will be listed at the left. Biblical and Hebrew names will be listed after each Indian word, accompanied by their biblical references. You will note that the comparative words are either identical or nearly identical. The differences are trivial. Even a non-linguist can notice that all these words sprang from the same source. The similarities are too abundant to be coincidental. Wanting to remain as conservative as possible, I present only a partial list. However, as conservative and brief as this list is, I believe I have presented enough examples to convince anyone that India did, indeed, at one time dominate in Bible Land.

         Tribes, Castes, and Sub-castes

Abri	Ibri (1 Chr. 24/27
Amal	Amal (1 Chr. 7:35).
Asaul	Asahel (2 Chr. 17:18)
Asheriya	Asher (Gen. 30:13)
Azri	Azriel (! Chr. 5:24)

Bal.	Baal (1 Chr. 5:5)
Bala; Balah	Bala (Josh. 19:3)
Bakru	Bokheru (1 Chr. 7:6)
Baktu	Baca (1 Chr. 8:38)
Banniya	Baana (1 Chr. 11:30)
Bellu	Bela (Gen. 14:9)
Bera; Baru	Beerah (1 (Chr. 5:6)
Basaya	Basseiah (1 Chr. 6:40)
Beroth	Beeroth (2 Sam. 4:2)
Bilgai	Bilgah (Neh. 12:5)
Buhana	Bohan (Josh. 15:6)
Buir	Beor (Ps. 23:4)
Butt	Bath (1 Ki. 7:26)
Caleb; Kleb	Caleb (1 Chr. 2:18)

                              

Dar; Dhar; Darku	Dor (1 Ki. 4:11)
Dara	Dara (1 Chr. 2:6)
Dum	Dumah (1 Chr. 1:30)
Gabba	Geba (Josh. 18:24)
Gaddar	Gedor (1 Chr. 4:4)
Gadha	Gad (1 Chr. 2:2)
Gaddi	Gaddi (Nu. 13:11)v Gani; Gani  Guni (1 Chr. 1:40)
Gareb	Gareb (1 Chr. 7:13)
Gomer	Gomer (Gen. 10:2)

Hahput	Hatipha (Neh. 7:56)v Iqqash Ikkesh (1 Chr. 11:28)
Ishai	Ishui (1 Sam. 14:49)
Israel	Israel (Gen. 32:28)

Kahan Masu	Kahana; Kan, Kanah (Josh. 19:28)
Kalkul	Calcol (1 Chr. 2:6)
Kanaz	Kenaz (Ju. 3:9)
Kar	Careah (2 Ki. 25:23)
Karrah	Korah (Nu. 26:9)
Kaul	Caul (Isa. 3:18)
Kadu; Kaddua; Khadu	Cauda (Act. 27:16)
Kotru	Keturah (Gen. 25:4)
Laddu	Lud (1 Chr. 1:17)
Lavi; Laveh	Levi (1Chr. 2:1)
Magar	Magor (Jer. 22:3)
Mahlu	Mahali (Ex. 6:19)
Maikri	Machir (Josh. 17:1)
Malla; Maula	Maaleh (Josh. 15:3)
Mallak	Mallouck (1 Chr. 6:44)
Matri	Matri (1 Sam. 10:21)
Meresh	Meres (Esther 1:14)
Mir	Mearah (Josh. 13:4)
Mahsa; Mahsi	Massah (Ex. 17:7)
Moza	Moza (1 Chr. 7:36)
Musa	Moses
Nehru	Nahor (1 Chr. 1:26)
Opal; Upal	Ophel (2 Chr. 28:3)
Pareh	Paruah (1 Ki. 4:17)
Phalu; Pau	Phallu; Puah; Pua (Nu. 26:23)
Poot; Put	Phut; Put (a Chr. 1:8)
Raina	Rinnah (1 Chr. 4:20)
Raphu	Raphu (1 Ki. 11:23)
Reshu; Resh; Reshi; Rhesa	(Luke 3:27)
Reu; Reu Wal; Reu	(Gen. 12:18)
Reual	Reuel (Nu. 2:14)
Sachu	Sechu (1 Sam. 19:22)
Sam	Shem (Gen. 5:32)
Sapru; Sapra	Saphir (Mic. 1:11)
Seh	Siah (Neh. 7:47)
Shahmiri	Shamir (1 Chr. 24:24)
Shaul	Shaul (1 Chr. 4:24)
Shavi	Shaveh (Gen. 14:17)
Shora	Sherah (1 Chr. 7:2)
Shuah	Shuah (1 Chr. 4:11)

Links to Godfrey's original work - 

Volume I https://archive.org/details/anacalypsisattem02higg 

Volume II 
https://archive.org/details/anacalypsisanatt014474mbp